The 22 pages of clinical lab test results below graphically illustrate how data integration and DISSM format standardization enhance readability and produce significant media reduction. In this example, 15 pages/screens of original fragmented clinical lab results were reduced to 7 pages/screens of indexed clinical information, a decrease of 53%.

The DISSM Way (7 Pages)
   Standardized
   Clinically Integrated
   Comprehensive
   Horizontal test array

Click to view samples
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]

The Old Way (15 Pages)
   Variable
   Fragmented
   Incomplete
   Vertical and/or horizontal test arrays 

Click to view samples
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]


DIAGNOSTIC TEST RESULTS REPORTING AND SHARING METHODS

Test Categories

The DISSM Way
“Sharing Test Results Information in the Same Way”

The Old Way
“Struggling With Raw Data”

MICROCHEM

  • Five cumulative test categories (standardized and clinically integrated)
  • Dates on Y axis and tests on X axis (subcategories 1, 2, and 3)
  • Dates on Y axis and tests in four standard columns on Y axis and (subcategories 4 and 5)
  • An average of 80 percent media reduction (pages and screens) and major improvement in readability and trend analysis demonstrated with prototypes at two hospitals in Rhode Island
  • Valuable opportunity for integrated test ordering application (“integrated CPOE”)

 

  • Infinitely variable reporting formats (“flexible and user-defined”), cumulative (in hospitals) and non-cumulative (in physician offices)
  • Fragmented (disintegrated) data resulting in laborious, error-prone trend analysis
  • Outrageous waste of time, money, computing power and paper
  • Costly patient safety, workflow and duplicative testing hazards


SUBSPECIALTIES

  • Fifteen cumulative test categories indexed by organ system
  • Fragmented, non-cumulative data received sporadically
  • Laborious, error-prone trend analysis (page/screen by page/screen)  

Copyright © 2007 - 2010 DIS SM All rights reserved.